FICPI BLOG (December 2020)

Title
Analysis of Practical Determination on Whether Parody Constitutes Infringement in the Taiwan Intellectual Property Court
Publisher
International Federation of Intellectual Property Attorneys (FICPI)
Author
George Huang (Director, Attorney at Law and Patent Attorney)
Published Date
8 December 2020

Summary of the article:

Is parody considered fair use or trademark infringement? In this article, George introduces notable cases, namely CHANEL’S “DOUBLE C DEVICE” trademark infringement case, LOUIS VUITTON MALLETIER v. LG HOUSEHOLD & HEALTH CARE (TAIWAN), LTD. and trademark infringement dispute between Hermes and Banane Taipei, and offers strategic advice for IP attorneys and brand owners operating in Taiwan on the question of whether parody constitutes infringement in the Taiwan Intellectual Property Court.

The article can be read here.

Login

Login Success